 |
|
Volume
13,
Number
4 In Memoriam of the Victims of Terrorist Attacks
April 2007 |
|
For More
Information Contact
Editors
Henry M. Burwell
(864) 250-2212
buzz.burwell@nelsonmullins.com
Carsten Alting
(404) 817-6137
carsten.alting@nelsonmullins.com
John C. McElwaine
(843) 720-4302
john.mcelwaine@nelsonmullins.com
Washington DC Office
George B. Wolfe
(202) 742-4564
Thomas F. Bardo
(202) 712-2817
Columbia Office
P. Mason Hogue
(803) 733-9417
Atlanta Office
* Carsten Alting
Rechtsanwalt
(404) 817-6137
June Towery
(404) 817-6597
Charlotte Office
Lawrence J. Scott
(704) 417-3108
Greenville Office
Henry M. Burwell
(864) 250-2212
John M. Campbell
(864) 250-2234
Raleigh Office
Steven Carr
(919) 877-3872
Charleston Office
John B. Hagerty
(843) 720-4308
John C. McElwaine
(843) 720-4302
Newman Jackson Smith
(843) 720-4309
Winston-Salem Office
Denise M. Gunter
(336) 774-3322
Myrtle Beach Office
Thomas F. Moran
(843) 946-5652
Boston Office
William T. Hogan III
(617) 573-4701
www.nelsonmullins.com
*Admitted as an attorney in
Germany
|
|
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND
TRADE |
|
Trade
Complaints
WTO:
Customs
U.S.:
Antidumping
U.S.:
-
The Commerce Department determined
that Argentina and Mexico have been dumping lemon juice in the U.S. (Lemon
Juice from Mexico and Argentina, ITA) and assigned preliminary
dumping margins ranging from 85.64% to 128.50% for Argentina and ranging
from 146.1% to 205.37% for Mexico (24 ITR 596; 4/26/07)
-
The Commerce Department has
initiated anti-dumping investigations on imports of glycine from India,
Japan and the Republic of Korea pursuant to the petition of GEO
Specialty Chemicals Inc. (24 ITR 597; 4/26/07)
|
|
IMMIGRATION |
|
Regulations
Promulgated Under the Nursing Relief Act Declared by the U.S. Federal
Court of Appeals to be in Conflict with the Act
-
8 C.F.R. §245.18(e) which provides
medical practice in a designated shortage area that occurred before the
approval of an immigrant visa petition filed under a national interest
waiver does not count towards the medical practice requirement and was
discarded as an unenforceable regulation
-
8 C.F.R. §204.12(d)(6) which
provides that a doctor who filed for national interest waiver before the
Act had to fulfill the five year medical practice requirement if the
waiver were denied prior to a certain date was discarded as an
unenforceable regulation
-
8 C.F.R. §204.12(b) and (d)(4)
that impose strict limitation periods on the completion of the medical
practice requirement remained intact as enforceable (Schneider v.
Chertoff, 450 F.3d 944, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13953 (9th Cir. June 7,
2006); 12 IB 489; April 15, 2007)
BALCA
Decision: Employer Established Good Faith Recruitment Efforts by
Contacting Qualified U.S. Workers by Certified Mail and Two Attempted
Phone Calls Notwithstanding the Lack of Certified Mail Receipts.
-
Outback Steakhouse Restaurant
sought labor certification to fill the position of cook. In reviewing
evidence submitted to qualify the foreign national candidate, the
Certifying Officer (CO) denied the labor certification on a finding of a
lack of good faith recruitment. The CO determined that the certified
mail and telephone records were incomplete but the decision was reversed
by BALCA on the grounds good faith recruitment was established through
evidence of attempted contact with U.S. workers by both certified mail
and telephone (12 IB 494; April 15, 2007)
I-129 and
I-539 Direct Filing Instructions are Issued
Obligation
to Reverify Employment Eligibility Under I-9 Rules
-
Knowledge acquired by an employer
after the initial hire may trigger an obligation to reverify the I-9
documents which demonstrate employment eligibility (8 C.F.R. Section 274
a.2(b)(1)(vi))
-
The obligation arises when :
-
the temporary employment
authorization expires
-
the employer receives
information from a government agency or
-
through other sources that an
employee may not be authorized to work (emphasis added)
-
the employee presents a receipt
for the application for an acceptable I-9 document (12 IB 387; April
1, 2007)
Does the
Social Security Administration Share Mismatch Data with the Immigration
Service Regarding Use of Social Security Numbers?
-
The Social Security Administration
(SSA) has limited the ability of the Immigration Service (ICE) to check
employee records to instances where it has “reasonable cause” to believe
that a worker is unauthorized (Immigration Enforcement Within the
United States CRS-45; RL 33351 April 6, 2006;
www.fas.org)
-
With certain specific exceptions,
SSA and IRS are not permitted to share information with any other agency
under IRS Ruling 6103 dealing with tax returns and confidential
information of a taxpayer
-
ICE may receive mismatched data
from the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) of SSA when there is an ongoing
investigation but it is not used to select employers to target for I-9
audits for investigations (12 IB 388; April 1, 2007)
-
Department of Homeland Security
proposed a new regulation June 8, 2006 to instruct employers how to
respond to a Social Security “no match” letter in order to avoid a
finding of “constructive knowledge” of unlawful employment of illegal
workers and to enjoy the “safe-harbor” procedures
-
Mester Mfg. Co. v. INS 879
Fed. 2d. 561 (9th Cir. 1989) held an employer was found to have
constructive knowledge after receiving notice that three workers were
suspected of green card fraud but failed to follow-up on that
information
DHS Issues
Proposed Regulation for REAL ID Driver’s Licenses and ID Cards
-
A Notice of Public Rule Making (NPRM)
establishes minimum required standards for information and features
appearing on identity documentation, presentation and verification of
information, physical security of locations where documents may be
produced and physical security of licenses and cards to minimize counterfeit
activities
-
The documents list which may be
submitted to establish identity is detailed as a key feature of the
regulation
-
Documents required shall be
verified electronically by the states
-
Procedures shall be established
for electronic verification of vital events reflected in the documents (EVVE
system)
-
Information that must appear on
the driver’s license or identification card is set forth in the NPRM (84
IR 652; March 19, 2007)
Hazelton,
Pennsylvania Local Ordinance Fines Landlords Who Rent to Illegal
Immigrants and Denies Permits to Businesses that Employ Such Persons
-
ACLU attorneys challenged the
local city ordinance and news media is reporting on the first federal
trial involving a local law dealing with illegal immigration (Univ.
of Pittsburgh, Jurist Legal News & Research, 3-22-07)
-
The case is a test that will
affect dozens of similar laws and ordinances which arguably usurp the
federal government’s exclusive power over immigration policy and
enforcement (84 IR 672; March 19, 2007)
|
|
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS AND
INVESTMENT |
|
Free
Trade Agreements
U.S.:
Export
Controls
U.S.:
|
|
LEGISLATIVE & LEGAL
DEVELOPMENTS |
|
Export Controls
U.S.:
-
The Export Enforcement Act of 2007 renews the authority
of the Commerce Department to administer the “dual use” export control
system, increases civil and criminal penalties for violators, authorizes
Special Agents with overseas investigative authority, protects
confidential business information and expands the list of criminal
violations on which the denial of export privileges may be based (24 ITR
574; 4/26/07)
Labor
U.S.:
Textile
U.S.:
Trade Adjustment Assistance
U.S.:
-
The U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) scolded the
U.S. Department of Labor for its arbitrary and capricious determination
that former typesetters for Merrill Corp. did not qualify for trade
adjustment assistance under the Trade Adjustment Act (TAA) despite
examples of certification of other workers producing unique and
intangible articles such as those produced by Merrill (Former
Employees of Merrill Corp v. U.S., Ct. Int.’l Trade, No. 03-00662)
(Slip Op. 07-46, 3/28/07); (24 ITR 524; 4/12/07)
Immigration
U.S.:
-
Incalza v. Fendi North America, Inc. 2007 WL656355
(9th Cir. Mar. 6, 2007) held that the federal immigration law (IRCA)
does not pre-empt a California labor law that bars employers from firing
an employee without good cause. The court determined a native and
citizen of Italy was not discharged because of allegedly unauthorized
employment status and that the employer lawfully could have taken action
other than discharge to be in compliance with immigration law holding
there is no conflict between federal and state laws because the
plaintiff had not been terminated because of allegedly unauthorized
employment and the employer lawfully could have taken other action other
than discharge and still be in compliance with immigration law rejecting
the argument of the employer the U.S. Supreme Court holding in the
Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. (537 U.S. 137) (2002) required
termination since Hoffman failed to address the question of
terminating employees who work authorization problems could be
expeditiously resolved by renewing an expired application or changing
the form of an existing permit (84 IB 765; April 2, 2007)
Sources:
IR - Interpreter Releases, Federal Publications, Inc.; Financial Times
(FT); ITR - International Trade Reporter, Bureau of National Affairs,
Inc.; IB-Bender’s Immigration Bulletin; ILT - Immigration Law Today,
American Immigration Lawyers Association Monthly Journal; IL -
International Lawyer, SMU School of Law; FT- Financial Times; TE - The
Economist Magazine; GATM - German American Trade Magazine published by the
German American Chamber of Commerce; WSJ - Wall Street Journal; ILN/ABA-International
Law News, American Bar Association; TMIJ-Tax Management International
Journal, Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.; AILA - American Immigration
Lawyer’s Association
International Law Bulletin
is an
international legal news digest published monthly as a service to Nelson
Mullins’ clients and friends. The articles are summaries of
particular developments in the law and are not intended to be a
solicitation or to render legal advice. This publication can be considered
advertising under applicable laws. Copyright 2007
|
|
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, L.L.P.
has offices located in
Charleston, Columbia, Greenville, and Myrtle Beach, South Carolina;
Atlanta, Georgia
Raleigh, Winston-Salem, Charlotte, North Carolina; Boston, Massachusetts;
Washington DC
|
|
1-800-237-2000 www.nelsonmullins.com |